And they won't be able to use 1.9 profits to help fund that extra investment. a) expecting an arc 100 out of a new player is like 2.5 times the investment - even with the support of a higher thread.Arc-80 with 1.9 Support costs 24k FP totalĪrc-80 with 1.92 Support costs 22.3k FP totalĪrc-100 with 1.9 support costs 62.9k FP totalĪrc-100 with 1.92 support costs 60.2k FP total.And even more levels after 100 to get to a point where they're incentivized to take spots as often as possible again.Įdit: Some numbers on Arc-80 vs Arc-100 as a baseline.
Basically just to do a public service of being able to help the thread move a little faster without hurting yourself. It also discourages people to add extra levels to their arc if that's "your thread" because they're doing those expensive levels to 100 with no prospect of regular profit. The main argument for never going to 1.92 is that it slows down the thread by having less people encouraged to take spots (since an arc-80 is at a loss and an arc-100 to break even is a lot more work). But it still costs thousands per level and 50 FP really doesn't mean that much to you anymore. Where 1.92 instead of 1.9 might save you 50 FP.
The most common flawed argument for 1.92 is on very high level buildings: "It costs so much, I need every bit I can get". Perhaps the most important place to get more than 1.9 is when you're first moving your arc to 80 and everything seems expensive (many guilds will offer 1.95 on Arc to members for instance to help support this) The main spot where a 1.92 thread would make a difference is moving through the sweet spot where it can lower the already low cost of a building substantially.
0 kommentar(er)
